Excerpt from
"Supplier to
Worldwide Toyota Factories: Made in Japan,"
Static electricity and its companion, dust, are more than a minor
annoyance. They damage printed circuits, mar painted surfaces and harm
numerous other processes, raising costs and lowering profits. We live
in an age of business competition where brand value is created by
superior quality, product performance and product design. Effective
antistatic and anti-dust measures can ensure a company achieves
quality superior to that of its rivals, scoring a home run in the
competitive race.
One might be mistaken, and think an ionizer is a niche product and
has nothing to do with international manufacturing competition. The
anti-static measures that superior ionizers provide can greatly
improve performance in many industries needing to reduce or eliminate
defects and productivity loss attributable to static electricity and
dust. The international manufacturers who will become the leaders of
the future are those who recognize the importance of static-free
production in their own processes.
That is the message that I believe and deliver.
A salesman called on the Toyota Motor Philippines factory in autumn
2001, carrying with him a demonstration ionizer. The salesman told the
factory management, "I brought this ionizer to show you how powerful
it will be in helping you solve your problem. Companies like yours
have various problems with other ionizers, but this is an amazing,
innovative ionizer an engineering development company invented and
patented."
The new product he brought with him was an ionizer that neutralizes
all static charges in a large space without using any device such as a
built-in fan or compressed air. Without air propulsion, ions travel a
very short distance before they are neutralized. Those that use air
propulsion do not stand a ghost of a chance of performing more than a
tiny fraction as well as the new, far superior ionizer. Its ions
travel several times farther, vastly increasing the size of the space
that can be treated.
The mechanism consists of two bar ionizers, each of which
discharges either positive or negative ions. When the bars are placed
up to 9 meters apart and face-to-face across a space requiring
ionization, the positive ions emitted from one bar and negative ions
from the facing bar are strongly attracted to each other, greatly
increasing the distance they travel and filling the entire space
between the bars with ions. As a result, everything within the space
is ionized, effectively neutralizing all static electricity without
requiring turbulent air to move ions around.
Some other anti-static systems use moisture. In theory, raising the
humidity in an enclosed space should dissipate static electricity.
However, excessive moisture in a manufacturing process usually causes
problems, such as oxidation (rust). Eliminating unnecessary moisture
can solve several additional manufacturing and quality problems.
The salesman demonstrated ionizing to the Toyota managers, using
his sales tool. "Watch carefully, as static charges disappear almost
instantly," the salesman said. The sales tool is a mannequin with
plastic hair that stands on end when charged with static electricity.
When the ionizer was switched on, its hair fell into place within
seconds, completely devoid of static.
When the Toyota management team witnessed the instant disappearance
of static electricity, they felt they were watching an amazing magic
show. One of the executives from Toyota Motor's Motomachi factory in
Nagoya, who was stationed at Philippines Toyota, stared at the salesman,
eyes wide. "Great! I've never seen a thing like this before," he said.
The old saying "seeing is believing" sums up his reaction.
The manager from Philippines Toyota asked, "If you don't mind, can
you leave this ionizer here for a while?" The salesman replied to the
Toyota manager, "I understand. We make it a rule to lend the product to
enable to test it in your own factory. If you would like to demonstrate
it at any other factory, I will be pleased to assist you."
After that initial visit, the salesman anxiously waited to hear the
results of the factory test. When they phoned, they told him, "The test
yielded excellent ionizing performance! However, we do not have the
expertise to accurately assess its performance here, nor do we have a
budget for purchasing at this time. But we feel that we should not drop
the investigation of this instrument. If you don't mind, we would like
to send it to the factory in Japan for a thorough assessment. Is it
possible?"
The company had made numerous presentations to many factories and had
heard a variety of reactions from them, but Toyota was the first case in
which the customer itself offered to perform a large-scale test. The
next phase of the Toyota story moved to the Motomachi factory in Toyota
City in the Aichi Prefecture, about 200 miles southwest of Tokyo. It
began with a call from Mr. Fuchigami, the manager in charge of the
factory's painting processes, asking to talk to me. Although the name
Fuchigami was unfamiliar, I accepted the call, eager to learn what
Toyota had decided.
Fuchigami explained, "Thank you for arranging for your sales staff to
take your ionizer to our affiliate company in the Philippines. Now we
request you to lend us the device that you demonstrated there. As you
might know, Toyota needs and uses many ionizers, but we would like to
test your new product. Is this acceptable?"
When Fuchigami's request was completed, I thanked him for his
interest and explained that when the product is loaned for a week, a
Trinc technician usually would go out to a customer's site to assist in
the installation and testing.
However, Fuchigami said, "It's not necessary. Our own engineers will
install it, design tests, and measure its performance compared to
ionizers in use."
How would the ionizer be accurately and fairly tested? Even with my
absolute confidence in the technology and efficacy of the product, it
was nevertheless natural to be anxious about the outcome, considering
that Toyota is one of the most respected companies in the world.
The one-week lending period flashed by, and Trinc still waited
impatiently for a reply from Toyota. Would the call come today or
tomorrow? But, day after day passed with no response at all. Time
continued to pass, three weeks, then four and then five with no
response. After lengthy suspense and anxiety, human psychology is such
that the mind learns to hide from hope and resigns itself to
disappointment. Trinc gradually came to expect that Toyota must have
dropped the performance test and forgotten they had borrowed the product
for just a one-week trial.
Test results
Finally, after six weeks, the phone call came. Fuchigami said, "Can
you please visit us? I want to meet you here as soon as possible." He
spoke calmly without revealing his thoughts, but his intention was
clear. Because he had asked me to meet with him, it was obvious that he
intended to present Toyota's decision.
The discussion began with Fuchigami's summary: "We borrowed the
ionizer for a long time, and we have tested it and evaluated its
performance in various ways. We have installed it in the factory to test
its dust adherence results on real automobiles. The video I am going to
show you now will explain the actual test."
He turned off the room lights and began to screen the footage. The
video showed an automobile flanked by my ionizers at the Motomachi
factory prototype test/tryout site, beside the production line, where
prototype vehicles are taken through several chambers similar to
classrooms or laboratories, to test various performance factors.
A black vehicle, assembled at the factory, was mounted on a paint
dolly. On both sides of the vehicle, which maintained zero voltage
through grounding, a pair of the ionizers had been set up in preparation
for testing. The story told by the video was intensely interesting, from
an engineering standpoint. First, before activating the ionizers, the
lab technician standing beside the vehicle on the painting dolly shook
and kneaded some gauze fabric, causing white, dust-like particles to
fall alongside the vehicle's black body, like a light snow shower. Next,
with the ionizers activated, the technician dropped the white particles
in exactly the same manner as before.
Fuchigami explained, "The painting problem caused by dust is an
everlasting issue. No matter how you clean the room, and even if you use
other ionizers, there is a limit as to how much dust is removed. On the
paint line, we have been fighting dust with tremendous efforts including
investment and manual labor. Well, please look at this next scene
carefully." Saying so, he resumed the video.
With the video running, Fuchigami commented, "Look at this carefully.
When ionizers are on, not only is the number of dust particles sticking
to the body dramatically reduced, but also the remaining particles
clinging to the body can easily be removed. Dust removal, which until
now has been impossible using any other ionizers, is now possible for
the first time. Yours is a marvelous invention, isn't it?"
One week after showing me the amazing video made at Toyota's
Motomachi factory, Toyota placed an order for the mechanism. It was
remarkable that Toyota took action so speedily, once it had completed
its own test. It is the usual (albeit superb) way Toyota operates, but
it was a unique, historic day for me. Once Trinc delivered the first
devices to Toyota, it began to order more and more and also bought
several other popular products that are similar to those of other
companies, but my inventions incorporate better and completely different
technology.
About the author: Makoto Takayanagi is president and founder of
Trinc Corp. and the inventor of its ionizer products. He also serves as
board chairman of the Japanese Static/Dust Consultative Meeting.
|